Conclusions bring closure to your discussion.
You do not need to restate your thesis verbatim. If you have
established a clear thesis and developed that thesis in the body
of the paper, your reader should have a good idea of the main
ideas in the paper. Thus, you are signaling to your reader that "you have dealt
with the topic as fully as you want to and that you believe your
discussion is complete" (Goldman, Hirsch 145).
You may want to pick back up some of the ideas that
began the paper. This "circling" can provide a sense of continuity for the
reader and provide logical structure for your paper. For example,
the introduction above discusses the Columbine shootings. A conclusion
might read as follows.
Although the controversy regarding gun control will never be
fully put to rest, establishing legislation to deal with the
moral issues that present themselves as the United States hurtles
toward the twenty-first century is imperative. Our children need
to know that they are safe not only in their homes, but in their
schools. The Columbine tragedy testifies not only to increasing
violence in the world, but also to the lack of preventative measures
surrounding guns. Unfortunately, violence will always be a part
of the world, but, fortunately, people have the means to limit
and control the weapons of violence. Americans should seize that
opportunity.
Submit an introduction and/or conclusion for comments to The
Writing Exchange.
Return
to Revising
|